Continue to watch these controversies concerning Pope Francis. I really do believe they are setting him up to be an anti-pope. Do you understand what I am saying? It is not a single pope or any single individual that is the ‘anti-Christ.’ It is the complete papal succession of popes or ‘bishop of Rome’ from Constantine the Great on. I would even include Constantine himself because it is the ‘usurpation’ of Christianity by imperial Rome that ushers in the ‘man of sin’ and ‘false prophet’ that arises out of the ‘removal’ or collapse of the pagan Roman empire. See my ‘man of sin’ photo album for better understanding here (https://www.facebook.com/groups/uncontrolled.opposition/permalink/2087876451230376/)” But the motive for Pope Francis to play an Antipope would provide a patsy or fall guy to be charged as the anti-Christ only to be removed and allowing for the ‘false church’ to exonerate themselves and its papal head from being the ‘genuine’ fulfillment of the ‘little horn’ …. ‘man of sin’ …. ‘false prophet’ …, all of which are synonymous with the ‘anti-Christ’ title.
But what is really confusing about this ‘no hell’ statement by Francis is that he is actually correct but since this goes against the majority teaching of ‘eternal torment’ in a ‘lake of fire,’ a false teaching that comes from the harlot church itself, it really puts him as an antagonist of sorts against the status quo. It really is a complex situation.
(Please study comment section for more in depth elaboration.)
I highly recommend reading Joseph Benson’s Commentary on Revelation, chapter 13 here: https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/rbc/revelation-13.html