While math may be a useful tool for recording empirical observation, it seems, by stark contrast, many have given over to the new-age “priests and scribes” calling themselves “scientists,” who have vigorously pushed the NWO-religion called pseudo “science.” However, “number THEORY,” when reasonably determined by way of its most plausible and obvious use and intent, as it is meant to be conservatively interpreted to the end that human experience NOT be found the slave to numeric equation, can and should, in this case, NOT replace that which is perceived via the six senses, and is hereby and herewith construed and declared merely representative of such human experience, forthwith calling upon all enlightened “warriors” to continue peacefully denouncing and condemning such aforementioned skulduggery, lest we allow our nation of people, and, indeed, the entire “whirled,” to slump into a dark age of emotionless, robotic drones, rendered categorically void of any and all human perception and feeling (hmm… perhaps that was precisely the Jesuit/Zionist goal).

In order to buttress this most-important point, I herewith present this quote from one of the most brilliant beings to have ever walked the face of this flat-and-motionless earth, i.e., Nikola Tesla, wherein Tesla rightly proclaims —

“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.” — Nikola Tesla, Modern Mechanics and Inventions, July, 1934,
US (Serbian-born) electrical inventor (1857 – 1943).

“Earth is a realm, it is not a planet. It is not an object, therefore, it has no edge. Earth would be more easily defined as a system environment. Earth is also a machine, it is a Tesla coil. The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with elector-magnetic levitation. Electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity. The stars are attached to the firmament.” — Nikola Tesla

*Einstein was once asked how it felt to be the smartest man alive. Einstein’s earnest reply was — “I don’t know, you’ll have to ask Nikola Tesla.”

*Here is precisely what Newton himself thought of his magical-and-all-powerful-but-unproven “farce” called “GRAVITY” — There is no immediate prospect of identifying the mediator of gravity. Attempts by physicists to identify the relationship between the gravitational force and other known fundamental forces are not yet resolved. Newton himself felt that the concept of an inexplicable action at a distance was “UNSATISFACTORY,” but that there was nothing more he could do at the time. Newton’s “THEORY” of gravitation requires that the gravitational force be transmitted instantaneously. He [Newton] was deeply uncomfortable with the notion of “action at a distance” that his equations implied. In 1692, in his third letter to Bentley, he wrote: “That one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one another, is to me so great an absurdity that, I believe, no man who has in philosophic matters a competent faculty of thinking could ever fall into it.” *Note: That’s Newton expressing his doubts to the Jesuits that educated people of that time would fall for their spinning-ball hoax. He [Newton] never, in his words, “assigned the cause of this [gravitational] power”. In all other cases, he used the phenomenon of motion to explain the origin of various forces acting on bodies, but in the case of gravity, he was “UNABLE TO EXPERIMENTALLY IDENTIFY” the motion that produces the force of gravity. Moreover, he refused to even offer a hypothesis as to the cause of this force on grounds that to do so was contrary to sound science. He [Newton] lamented that “philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain” for the source of the gravitational force, as he was convinced “by many reasons” that there were “causes hitherto unknown” that were fundamental to all the “phenomena of nature”. These fundamental phenomena are still under investigation and, though hypotheses abound, the definitive answer has yet to be found. And in Newton’s 1713 General Scholium in the second edition of Principia — “I have not yet been able to discover the cause of these properties of gravity from phenomena and I feign no hypotheses… ”

*Interestingly enough, both Newton and Einstein were — 1. working with/for the Jesuits; 2. accused of plagiarism; 3. only able to offer “THEORIES;” and, 4. engaged in pseudo “science.”

source

10 Replies to “The Flat Earth – More Definitive Proof Found Under Water!”

  1. Dear Johann, first of all, I am also from Swiss descent on my father's side (his people came to America from Grossdietwil, Lucerne County, Switzerland, in 1816, and my great, great, great, great grandfather was Franciscus Dominicus Antonius Ling, 1739 – 1803), and I grew up in Key West, Florida, back in the 60s and 70s; so here we are now, you and I, moving on to this most-fascinating discussion!

    1) As I have believed in the spinning-globe model for more than fifty years of my life, I would like to start by stating that I'm not "stuck on" either the globular nor the flat-earth model, but that, rather, as a "hater of lies" and a "lover of truth," I'm only interested in following the most credible evidence, whichever way it may lead. Having expressed that, I admit that I also have read about the flash-frozen woolly-mammoth elephants that were found with food still undigested in their stomachs, as well as the discovery of frozen humans that were estimated to be some ten or twelve-thousand years old, both of which I must agree are quite curious, especially on a flat-and-motionless earth… however, it seems that for one to presume an immediate drop in the earth's temperature could ONLY be due to some sort of flipping of the earth on it's so-called "axis," which thereby allegedly created a "shifting of the poles," subsequently allowing one, such as yourself, to further extrapolate that the earth must therefore be "a spinning sphere," truly seems to begin with the first (1st) theory being used in order to prop up the second (2nd) theory, which in turn props up the third (3rd) theory. Additionally, there are several other possibilities that I can offer you, that may account for the sudden drop in temperature, as well as the world-wide flood. Such theories as these may best be related to you via the following two (2) links, which will take you to a couple of really-marvelous videos that I came across about a year-and-a-half ago, the first of which is titled "Symbols Of An Alien Sky," which, I promise you, has absolutely nothing to do with "aliens" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7EAlTcZFwY), and the second video is called "Remembering The End Of The World" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oophJNlP-fk), and I do suggest watching them in their respective order, so that you may absorb the knowledge via the most coherent progression.

    2) I have my own theory regarding "Atlantis," aka "Atland" by the Frisians, and "Atlantica" by the Basques… i.e., if you, Johann, are familiar with the "myth" that Atlantis not only sank to the bottom of the ocean, but that it continued to exist below the waters, then I believe the explanation given in Genesis is very accurate, and that our land (Atland), i.e., the entire earth as we know it, was given a protective dome, called "the firmament," and cast below the heavenly waters, whereby the waters were separated into those above (as above, so below), the middle waters contained within the firmament, and the waters below our oceans. This account is also validated by the fact that our entire earth has always been closely associated with the name "Atlas." This theory also explains why, although many have tried, "Atlantis" has never been found… that's because it's been hidden in plain sight all along, i.e., we're standing on "Atlantis" right now! This theory is further buttressed by Socratic and later Platonic accounts of "Atlantis" being a round "island" continent (the Pangaea theory perhaps?), which most accurately describes the round flat-earth model, with "Antarctica" forming the outer ring, and "the Arctic Circle" forming the inner ring. Regarding the Hopi and Navajo accounts that I have read, wherein there is an island at the center of the earth, with a great tree growing out from the same, and with the sun moving "from left to right," again, the flat-earth model seems to offer the most simple and plausible explanation (another possibility could have something to do with electromagnetic interference of the sun, possibly reversing polarity… which could help explain the origin of the "swastika"), i.e., on a flat earth, where its indigenous people inhabit the center of the circle, there is no "north, south, east or west;" e.g., if you're standing in the center, any direction from which you look out will always be facing "Antarctica," or "south;" subsequently, if you're facing what globe-earthers would call "south," then the sun would most-naturally move from left to right, rather than right to left. Furthermore, in my humble opinion, the perceived bending of light around the sun does not prove "gravity," but can much-more simply be explained by the double-slit experiment, or even more-simply due to the optical distortion created by heat and/or humidity in the air (out of habit, I almost wrote "atmosphere," i.e., "atmo-sphere"), thereby causing a mirage-type visual effect to occur. Moreover, light refraction can happen due to enumerable causes, e.g., moving through a prism, or perhaps even a dome-shaped "firmament!"

    3) Another compelling reason that I've abandoned the globular model is it's source of origin… i.e., I don't find the Vatican/Jesuits/Zionists as being particularly trustworthy and credible. In fact, to the contrary… I believe these groups are intent on hiding the true knowledge of our earth and the beings who people her; e.g., when I conduct an epistemological study of the globe-earth theory, it can be traced back to the same Jews that infiltrated and subverted the Egyptians, Romans, Greeks and Babylonians, just to name a few… not to mention the fact that they've completely monopolized the history of our people (virtually all history books are written/published by Jews). They want us to forget who Aryan people really are/were, and create perpetual war, pitting us against our own people. Now they've infiltrated and subverted virtually every nation on earth, with the possible exception of Iran, North Korea, Burma, and a few other countries that have expelled their debt-slave banking system, e.g., Iceland, Russia, and most recently, Hungary. If you look into it, Johann, you'll see that this cult of sun/moon-worshiping "Pharisees," aka "priests and scribes," have been using the study of cosmology, i.e., Astrology, aka the Horoscope (the-eye-of Horus-cope) in order to con the masses and the monarchies for thousands of years, and they continue by bilking the American people out of almost twenty-billion dollars last year alone, for phony NASA projects! But more importantly, if you want to became "god on earth," as these psychopaths do, you must first remove the true creator from the peoples' hearts and minds, which is precisely what these new-age "priests and scribes," who call themselves "scientists," are attempting to do, by way of creating the NWO-religion called "science," while continuing to infiltrate, subvert, ridicule and mock traditional religion/science. Case in point, check out these two videos linked below… the first one is about scientists who were incited to lie, by the Jewish cosmologist Lawrence Krauss, in order to occlude scientific evidence of geocentrism… and the second video, which features Ben Stein, also a Jew, is about the government and various institutions of so-called "higher learning," blackballing any and every scientist/professor who might even entertain the notion of investigating intelligent design… i.e., professors/scientists who were merely exploring the same in order to find possible answers to some of our most fundamental questions concerning issues that traditional scientific means and methods have miserably failed to explain… and though Stein does champion the cause of these black-balled professors and scientists, he also, however, exploits the platform in order to perpetuate one of the most despicably-horrendous lies of all the ages… i.e., the so-called "holocaust" and its crushing reparations, which are perpetrated by way of an absolutely-intolerable and fraudulent HOAX, that has enslaved the hearts and minds of our German brothers and sisters, and needs to be abolished IMMEDIATELY! —
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83fSBZ2OQGE
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5EPymcWp-g&t=136s

  2. Flat Earth International Conference November 2017, North Carolina USA – How the Truth Movement has gone astray
    The lineup of speakers includes 1 convicted criminal, 5 Christian evangelicals who disavow the validity of science and claim that a heavenly Dome covers the Earth, one Truman Show advocate, and a few other plain flat Earth conspirators.
    {…http://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2-uncategorised/383-flat-earth-international-conference-2017-how-the-truth-movement-has-gone-astray
    {…http://flatearthlunacy.com/
    None have any scientific training, yet they want to tell us how the world really is.

  3. no I have never thought there was something wrong with this world, just the people in it. People are wrong all the time.
    this is apples and oranges don't let this trick you. look at all of the locations that are being shown in this video, don't you think they know where they are in the world? Just like you know where you are?

  4. how can you explain the continuous days of darkness or sunlight at the poles for months at a time?
    that makes no sense that you can see the Sun revolve around the earth from the North Pole while the South Pole is in total darkness. Anybody got an explanation for that in Flat Earth theory?

  5. at one minute and 11 seconds then it explains why continental drift is a faith-based theory but it does not explain what parts are faith-based. where is your evidence that the theory has problems? You just broadly state that it's wrong but give no evidence as to why!
    catchy Tunes though I like the music 馃檪

Leave a Reply